Factors Influencing Generation Z Bachelor of Nursing Students' Decision to Choose Nursing as a Career: A Pilot Study.

Introduction: Despite nurses representing the largest healthcare professional group, the number is not enough for global health coverage. Understanding Generation Z students' intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, internal and external influences, and beliefs in choosing nursing education is crucial. This knowledge empowers universities to enhance nursing program enrollment through targeted promotion and recruitment strategies. Objective: The aim was to understand why Italian students of Generation Z choose the Nursing Degree Course. Methods: In this pilot study, a cross-sectional design was used. A survey with closed and open answers analyzing demographics, opinions, and motivations among new enrolled nursing students was administered on the first day of the Bachelor of Nursing Degree course. Descriptive statistics were used. Quantitative data were analyzed with Chi-square and ANOVA tests and qualitative data underwent content analysis and coding. Correlation analysis explored relationships between qualitative and quantitative results. Results: Forty first-year students (85% female, average age 22) completed the questionnaire. The choice of the degree pathway, as the first or second option, is influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, the student's opinions, and family and social influences. Significant positive and negative associations were evidenced. Negative factors affecting choice included location and the responsibility for nursing care, while positive factors included role models, family advice, passion, curiosity for healthcare, the desire to help others, and family influences on decision-making. Conclusions: Among Italian generation Z students, the choice of the nursing degree pathway is influenced by social models, family advice, passion, the desire to help others, and curiosity. Universities should be more proactive in their recruitment and promotion efforts, transforming these events into vibrant meeting points for professionals from diverse nursing specialties. They should also implement robust information policies that highlight career possibilities spanning clinical practice, management, education, and research areas within the field.

Nurse Managers Coping Strategies for Crisis Management: Qualitative Systematic Review.

Stressor-related disorders are a growing issue for both the individual and the organizations. The aim of the study was to analyze the strategies used by nurse managers to face crises. A systematic review of the literature, including qualitative studies was performed. Data were analyzed using framework-based synthesis and summarized into domains. Quality was evaluated using the JBI QARI Checklist. 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. Data collection was based on interviews, followed by questionnaires and focus groups. Good communication, organizational commitment and emotional support were the principal domains. Institutions should support nurse managers to cope with stress and make suggestions for adaptations.

Nurse-Administered Propofol Sedation Training Curricula and Propofol Administration in Digestive Endoscopy Procedures: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

Although efficacy and safety of nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol and nurse-administered propofol sedation practices have been amply demonstrated in patients at low American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status risk, they are still severely limited. To date, it is quite difficult to find a protocol or a shared training program. The aim of the study was to verify requirements, types of training, and operating methods described in the literature for the administration of propofol by a nurse. A scoping review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and in line with Arksey and O'Malley's framework, within four main databases of biomedical interest: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science. We selected studies published during the last 20 years, including only nurses not trained in anesthesia. Seventeen articles were eligible. Despite the differences between the training and administration methods, efficacy and safety of deep sedation managed by trained nurses were comparable, just like when sedation was administered by certified registered nurse anesthetists. Training programs have been investigated in detail by only a small number of studies, although its efficacy and safety have been widely demonstrated. It is important, then, to collect evidence that allows developing of unified international guidelines for training methods to offer safe and cost-effective quality sedation.

Self-Perceived Clinical Competence of Nurses in Different Working Experiences: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Competence is an essential concept for measuring nurses' performance in terms of effectiveness and quality. To this end, our analysis highlighted the process of acquiring competencies, their self-evaluation into clinical practice, and how their proficiency levels change throughout the nursing career. In detail, this research explored nurses' perceived level of competence and the factors that influence it in different contexts. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey using a structured questionnaire to assess the nursing participants' perception of their competencies in different clinical settings was accomplished. RESULTS: A descriptive and bivariate analysis was performed on 431 nurses. Most respondents assessed their level of competence to be higher than their roles required. The Kruskal-Wallis test confirmed that nursing experience was a relevant factor influencing nursing competencies. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest improving the competence of practicing nurses, using experience as a measurable effect of their development.

Nursing Sensitive Outcomes evaluation in the Emergency Department: An Umbrella Review / Evaluación de resultados sensibles de Enfermería en el Servicio de urgencias. Revisión de alcance / Avaliação de resultados de enfermagem sensíveis no pronto-socorro. Revisão do escopo

Objective. The aim of this review was to identify reported nursing-sensitive outcomes in the Emergency Department to date. Methods. An Umbrella review was conducted. Four databases, CINAHL, Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus, were searched from inception until October 2022. MeSH terms were: "nursing", "sensitivity and specificity", "emergency service, hospital", "nursing care". Two reviewers independently screened studies against the inclusion criteria for eligibility, extracted data and assessed study quality with the SIGN tool. Results of the included studies were summarized and described in themes for narrative analysis. The study was enrolled in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42022376941) and PRISMA guidelines were followed. Results. The search strategy yielded 2289 records. After duplicate removal, title, abstract and full-text eligibility screening, nine systematicInvest Educ Enferm. 2023; 41(3): e03Nursing Sensitive Outcomes evaluation in the Emergency Department:An Umbrella Reviewreviews were included in the review. A total of 35 nursing-sensitive outcomes were reported. The most described outcomes were waiting times, patient satisfaction and time to treatment. The less measured were mortality, left without being seen and physical function. Synthesizing nursing-sensitive outcomes in themes for reporting, the most measured outcomes were within the safety domain (n=20), followed by the clinical (n=9), perceptual (n=5) and the least explored functional domain (n=1). Conclusion. Nursing sensitive outcomes research in emergency nursing practice is a conceptual challenge still in its early stage. Several nursing-sensitive outcomes were identified in this review that can evaluate the contribution of emergency department nursing care to patient outcomes. Further research is required to explore patient outcomes sensitive to emergency nursing care.

Objetivo. Identificar los resultados sensibles de enfermería reportados en los Servicios de Urgencias. Métodos. Se realizó una revisión general. Se hicieron búsquedas en cuatro bases de datos, CINAHL, Pubmed, Web of Science y Scopus, desde su inicio hasta octubre de 2022. Los términos MeSH empleados fueron: "nursing", "sensitivity and specificity", "emergency service, hospital", "nursing care". Dos revisores examinaron de forma independiente los estudios en función de los criterios de inclusión para determinar su elegibilidad, extrajeron los datos y evaluaron la calidad de los estudios con la herramienta SIGN. Los resultados de los estudios incluidos se resumieron y describieron en temas para el análisis narrativo. El estudio se inscribió en el registro PROSPERO (CRD42022376941) y se siguieron las directrices PRISMA. Resultados. La estrategia de búsqueda produjo 2289 registros. Tras la eliminación de duplicados y el cribado de elegibilidad de título, resumen y texto completo, se incluyeron en la revisión nueve revisiones sistemáticas. Se informó de un total de 35 resultados sensibles a la enfermería. Los resultados más descritos fueron los: tiempos de espera, la satisfacción del paciente y el tiempo hasta el tratamiento. Los menos medidos fueron la mortalidad, el tiempo sin ser evaluado y la función física. Sintetizando los resultados sensibles a la enfermería en temas para la notificación, los resultados más medidos estaban dentro del dominio de la seguridad (n=20), seguidos por el clínico (n=9), el perceptivo (n=5) y el dominio funcional menos explorado (n=1). Conclusión. En esta revisión se identificaron varios resultados sensibles a la enfermería que pueden evaluar la contribución de los cuidados de enfermería en los servicios de urgencias a los resultados de los pacientes. La investigación de resultados sensibles a la enfermería en la práctica de la enfermería de urgencias es un reto conceptual que aún se encuentra en su fase inicial.

Objetivo. Identificar resultados de enfermagem sensíveis notificados em Serviços de Emergência. Métodos. Foi realizada uma revisão geral. Foram pesquisadas quatro bases de dados: CINAHL, Pubmed, Web of Science e Scopus, desde a sua criação até outubro de 2022. Os termos MeSH utilizados foram: "enfermagem", "sensibilidade e especificidade", "serviço de emergência, hospital", "cuidados de enfermagem". Dois revisores selecionaram independentemente os estudos em relação aos critérios de inclusão para determinar a elegibilidade, extraíram os dados e avaliaram a qualidade do estudo com a ferramenta SIGN. Os resultados dos estudos incluídos foram resumidos e descritos em temas para análise narrativa. O estudo foi registrado no registro PROSPERO (CRD42022376941) e as diretrizes PRISMA foram seguidas. Resultados. A estratégia de busca produziu 2.289 registros. Após remoção das duplicatas e triagem do título, resumo e texto completo para elegibilidade, nove revisões sistemáticas foram incluídas neste estudo. Foram relatados 35 resultados de enfermagem sensíveis, sendo os mais descritos: tempo de espera, satisfação do paciente e tempo para tratamento. Os menos frequentes foram: mortalidade, tempo sem avaliação e função física. Sintetizando os resultados sensíveis à enfermagem por meio de tópicos de relato, os mais mensurados foram dentro do domínio segurança (n=20), seguido do domínio clínico (n=9), do perceptual (n=5) e do funcional. menos explorados (n=1). Conclusão. Esta revisão identificou vários resultados sensíveis à enfermagem que podem avaliar a contribuição dos cuidados de enfermagem nos serviços de urgências para os resultados dos pacientes. A investigação de resultados sensíveis na prática de enfermagem em emergências é um desafio conceitual que ainda está em fase inicial.

Nursing Sensitive Outcomes evaluation in the Emergency Department: An Umbrella Review.

Objective: The aim of this review was to identify reported nursing-sensitive outcomes in the Emergency Department to date. Methods: An Umbrella review was conducted. Four databases, CINAHL, Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus, were searched from inception until October 2022. MeSH terms were: "nursing", "sensitivity and specificity", "emergency service, hospital", "nursing care". Two reviewers independently screened studies against the inclusion criteria for eligibility, extracted data and assessed study quality with the SIGN tool. Results of the included studies were summarized and described in themes for narrative analysis. The study was enrolled in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42022376941) and PRISMA guidelines were followed. Results: The search strategy yielded 2289 records. After duplicate removal, title, abstract and full-text eligibility screening, nine systematic reviews were included in the review. A total of 35 nursing-sensitive outcomes were reported. The most described outcomes were waiting times, patient satisfaction and time to treatment. The less measured were mortality, left without being seen and physical function. Synthesizing nursing-sensitive outcomes in themes for reporting, the most measured outcomes were within the safety domain (n=20), followed by the clinical (n=9), perceptual (n=5) and the least explored functional domain (n=1). Conclusion: Nursing sensitive outcomes research in emergency nursing practice is a conceptual challenge still in its early stage. Several nursing-sensitive outcomes were identified in this review that can evaluate the contribution of emergency department nursing care to patient outcomes. Further research is required to explore patient outcomes sensitive to emergency nursing care.

Assessment of Patient Satisfaction in Digestive Endoscopy: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Endoscopic examinations are often perceived as invasive, annoying, and painful procedures. For this reason, it is essential to know the patient's opinion to improve service quality and adherence to screening programs. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) recommend the identification of quality indicators, including patient satisfaction. The aim of this narrative review of the literature is to investigate the tools available to evaluate customer satisfaction in digestive endoscopy, highlighting which sections and items should be present in a questionnaire for complete evaluation. A narrative review of the literature was performed through five biomedical databases. A total of 125 studies were selected. The review process resulted in a total of 12 scientific papers meeting the inclusion criteria. This review suggests which items and sections should be present in a questionnaire that evaluates customer satisfaction in digestive endoscopy. Customer satisfaction verification programs in the normal routine of a digestive endoscopy service are essential to allow continuous improvement of the offered services.

Defining nursing workload predictors: A pilot study.

AIM: To explore predictors of perceived nursing workload in relation to patients, nurses and workflow. BACKGROUND: Nursing workload is important to health care organisations. It determines nurses' well-being and quality of care. Nevertheless, its predictors are barely studied. METHODS: A cross-sectional prospective design based on the complex adaptive systems theory was used. An online survey asked nurses to describe perceived workload at the end of every shift. Data were gathered from five medical-surgical wards over three consecutive weeks. We received 205 completed surveys and tested multivariate regression models. RESULTS: Patient acuity, staffing resources, patient transfers, documentation, patient isolation, unscheduled activities and patient specialties were significant in predicting perceived workload. Nurse-to-patient ratio proved not to be a predictor of workload. CONCLUSIONS: This study significantly contributed to literature by identifying some workload predictors. Complexity of patient care, staffing adequacy and some workflow aspects were prominent in determining the shift workload among nurses. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Our findings provide valuable information for top and middle hospital management, as well as for policymakers. Identification of predictors and measurement of workload are essential for optimizing staff resources, workflow processes and work environment. Future research should focus on the appraisal of more determinants.

The Role of the Leader on the nurses perception of work well-being.

BACKGROUND: Work well-being can affect performance and quality of care. Previous literature described the influence of leadership styles on nurse turnover, job satisfaction, attitudes and behaviours. There is a need to explore more nurses' perception of their leaders and related effects in the work environment. AIM: The aim of this study was to explore relationships between nurses' inspiration by the leader and nurses perceptions of work pleasure, work problems, and teamwork satisfaction. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional pilot study based on the theory of social exchange (Gouldner, 1960). We administered some of QEEW instrument scales to nurses working in five medical-surgical wards of a hospital. Simple linear regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: We received 81 completed questionnaires. The inspiration by the leader showed to be an antecedent of work pleasure (R2=26%), work problems (R2=30%), and teamwork satisfaction (R2=28%). CONCLUSIONS: An inspiring leadership was associated with nurse perceptions of reduced work problems, and increased teamwork satisfaction and work pleasure. The role of the leader and the use of an appropriate leadership style is therefore essential to increase levels of well-being in nurses. Future studies with a larger sample are needed to confirm our findings. NURSING IMPLICATIONS: Our results suggest that leadership style has a prediction effect on perceived nurse well-being. Moreover, leadership style has an impact on work climate and interdisciplinary teamwork. Therefore, chief executives should invest energies in leadership training and continuing education in order to develop among ward manager's effective leadership competencies.

Identification of nursing workload determinants for management of staffing resources: a cross-sectional pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Top managers and policy makers measure nursing workload (NW) based on nurse-to-patient ratios or on nursing hours per patient a day, as a standard. To offer patients care of quality and to prevent negative outcomes on staff, leaders should consider specific workflow aspects when determining staffing assets. AIM: The aim of this study was to identify some of NW deter-minants, particularly those linked to adequacy of staffing resources. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional prospective pilot study. Data were gathered in five medical-surgical wards of a University Hospital, through an online survey, asking nurses at the end of every shift, for three consecutive weeks, to describe the workload perceived. RESULTS: We collected 205 surveys. A multivariate regression model was tested. Adequacy of staffing resources was signifi-cantly related to NW ( =0.372), whether nurse-to-patient ratio was not. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings, although arising from a pilot study, are very important for organizations. These results put in discussion what was up to now used to take decisions on staffing resources, i.e., Nurse-to-Patient Ratios or Nursing Hours Per Patient a Day indicators. Further research is needed to confirm our results. NURSING IMPLICATIONS: Our findings can be useful to hospitals middle and top management for definition of staffing assets. Adequacy of staffing includes not only the number of nurses and nurse assistants present in the shift, but also their expertise and ability to organize the work of these resources. Therefore, staffing adequacy rather than nurse-to-patient ratio should be considered when planning staffing assets. Interventions to improve nurses and nurse assistants' expertise are essential.

Essential elements in determining patient's complexity of nursing care.

BACKGROUND: Nurses dedicate majority of working time to satisfy patients' needs, which are oftentimes complex. Although the concept of patient's complexity of care (PCC) has been extensively studied, it remains undefined in its essential characteristics. Various tools for assessing PCC have been developed, yet, there is no gold standard of reference. AIM: This study intends to explore the elements that determine PCC focusing on the patient's needs. METHODS: The bed management team of a University Hospital developed in 2010 a PCC measurement instrument, similar to a triage system, to classify rapidly patients into macro-levels of care complexity (low, medium, high, intensive). Descriptive analysis of prospectively collected data registered in nursing records during 2016-2017 are presented in this study. The incidence of individual metrics on the value assigned to the overall PCC level was calculated. RESULTS: 26593 patients' records were analyzed. The final level of PCC was equal to patient's level of autonomy in 92,2% of cases, to clinical stability in 74,4% and to cognitive status in 58,4%. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding indicate that essential elements to determine PCC are patient's autonomy and clinical stability. Therefore, nurses can use these metrics to classify quickly PCC in their work settings. NURSING IMPLICATIONS: Identifying and measuring PCC is very important for nurses. It can facilitate and support nurse decision-making in design, implementation and evaluation of activities aimed at improving patient care. Moreover, it can help in the distribution of care loads in the shift, and from an organizational point of view, it can allow defining staffing assets.

High-fidelity simulation for the education of nursing students: a scoping review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: High-fidelity simulation can be defined as a technique to refine specific human performance in a protected environment, and thanks to the innovation of technologies it has been possible to obtain increasingly realistic performances. The aim of this study is to map and describe the effects of training through a high-fidelity simulation method on the technical and non-technical skills of nursing students in an emergency setting. METHODS: A scoping review was chosen as research methodology within some main databases of biomedical interest: MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Academic Search Index, Science Citation Index and ERIC. RESULTS: 530 articles were selected. Of these, 21 met the inclusion criteria and underwent the review process. Participants undergoing the intervention demonstrated better skills than the control group when subjected to a simulation based on realistic scenarios. The selected articles can be divided into two categories: those that focus essentially on non-technical skills and those that study only technical skills. CONCLUSION: Evidence suggests that HFS should include feedback, briefing and debriefing; it should be applied in every area of nursing education; student self-efficacy, confidence and competence are key principles to consider when measuring the effect of a simulation environment.

Nursing Assessment of Wound-Related Pain: An Italian Learning Survey.

BACKGROUND: Pain is an important symptom in wound management, and the choice of treatment directly affects the patient's quality of life. Pain assessment (PA) is essential for quality wound care and, in Italy, mandatory by law. OBJECTIVE: To administer a dedicated learning survey to obtain a better sense of current PA practices, ensure more training, improve procedures, and reduce malpractice. METHODS: A 16-month learning survey of nurses based on a validated questionnaire developed for this project. RESULTS: The survey sample comprised 512 questionnaires. Of respondents, 78% were female, 56.1% were older than 40 years, 94% were RNs, and 6% were wound care specialist nurses. Participants performed a range of dressing changes per week (1-5, 46.3%; 6-20, 34.4%; >21, 19.3%). Although 93% of respondents considered PA important, only 26% recognized it as a vital parameter, and barely one-quarter (25.4%) were aware of current legislation mandating PA. The majority (95.3%) believed that PA is not consistent with pain perceived by the patient. Further, 87.3% stated that they did not have adequate knowledge to conduct a PA, 91.4% did not consider themselves up-to-date on PA, and 81% did not document PA results. However, specific wound care training leads to significantly better PA (P < .001): 71.9% of wound care specialist nurses recognized pain as a vital parameter, and 59.4% were aware of current legislation regarding PA; further, 81.3% consistently evaluated pain, 59.4% documented PA results, and 50% communicated the outcome to the physician in charge. CONCLUSIONS: The results illustrate the lack of sensitivity, training, and education that Italian RNs have regarding PA in wound care.